ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

New MADR Norms – the Good, the Bad and the Ugly for renewables

25 Octombrie 2022   |   Mihaela Nyerges, Partner - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners

The Norms have been finally adopted earlier this month. Now that they are here, what do they mean for development of renewables?

 
 
Ever since the Land Fund Law was amended to allow the development of renewables on extra murros land, the entire industry has been waiting for the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (“MADR”) to issue the application norms thereof (the “Norms”).

The Norms have been finally adopted earlier this month. Now that they are here, what do they mean for development of renewables?

As a preliminary note, although the Norms were expected to clarify aspects related to projects exceeding 50 hectares, the Norms are limited to amending the procedure for removing the land from the agricultural circuit, in order to align it with the new provisions of the Land Fund Law.

1.         Surface to be removed from agricultural circuit in case of dual use of the land

The biggest gain bought by the Norms is that they clarified which sections of the land should be removed from agricultural circuit in case of dual use of the land (power generation and agricultural activities). These are the sections on which ground level constructions are being erected: such as the pillars of the mounting structure, invertors, transformers substations, storage facilities, access roads.

Therefore, in case of PV projects, it is clarified that only the land affected by the pillars should be removed from agricultural circuit, not also the land corresponding to panels projection. Such could contribute substantially to the decrease of the land removal tax, which is one of the main costs in the development process. However, the practical impact is not that high, since (i) the dual use of the land is not allowed for arable land (which is frequently the land suitable for power generation projects) and (ii) the above principles do not apply to pastures (as we will explain below).

In view of the above, the applicant should submit, among other, the technical project outlining the type of project, the placement of the project components, occupation degree, the agricultural activities to be conducted, surfaces to be used for dual purpose.

2.         Indirect limitation to developing power generation capacities inside farms only

One of the mandatory documents for removing the land from agricultural circuit in case of renewable generation capacities is the “technical project regarding the placement within the farms of the renewable power generation facilities used exclusively for the own consumption of the farms.”

This document implies that the power generation capacities may be erected only within farms and only for ensuring the power consumption of the farms. This is obviously a limitation which is no longer existing in the Land Fund Law (following the recent changes), and which may not be enacted through a legal enactment inferior to the Land Fund Law (such as the Norms).

In our view, this provision is the result of a clerical error, and we can only hope that it will be corrected shortly before causing (another) blockage in the development process.  

 

3.         Unclear land regime between land removal decision and building permit

The land is removed from the agricultural circuit through the decision adopted by the relevant county agricultural department. However, according to the Norms, the land can be registered with the Land Book as buildable land only later on in the development process, after obtaining the building permit.

It is therefore unclear the legal and tax regime of the land during the period between the land removal decision and the building permit. 

4.         Unclear rules for requalification of the land as agricultural in case of failed projects

The Norms provide that, if the investment works are not initiated within 5 years from the land removal decision, the land is requalified back as agricultural land “by virtue of law”, based on a notification sent to the relevant county agriculture department by the land removal beneficiary. 

The requalification of the land as agricultural land “by virtue of law” seems to imply that this requalification occurs automatically upon the expiry of the 5 years period, without another administrative act being needed from the authorities. However, such principle seems to be contradicted by the fact that a notification should be sent by the beneficiary. Also, if the notification is sent long time after the 5-year term, it is not clear what will be the legal and tax regime of the land in the period between the expiry of the 5-year term and the notification.

Also, judging from the experience of the first wave of renewables (after which many landowners were stuck with intra muros lands and had to face lengthy court/administrative proceedings to change back the land destination), the beneficiary may no longer have any motivation to file such request. From this perspective, it seems more appropriate that the landowner should be also allowed to file such notification in case the superficies agreements are terminated due to failed projects. 

5.         No rules for pastures

The Norms do not set out the rules applicable to pastures. The reason for this is that the Norms are amending only the general regulation applicable to agricultural removal of all types of lands (pastures excluded), without touching the regulation dedicated to pastures removal from agricultural circuit.  

It, therefore, remains to be seen whether the rules referred above regarding the dual use of the land will be replicated for pastures. Such rules will decisively influence the feasibility of developing renewables on pastures.

 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


 

Ascunde Reclama
 
 

POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


Nume *
Email (nu va fi publicat) *
Comentariu *
Cod de securitate*







* campuri obligatorii


Articol 799 / 4457
 

Ascunde Reclama
 
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
LegiTeam: Lawyer - Corporate M&A | Reff & Associates
LegiTeam: Zamfirescu Racoţi Vasile & Partners recrutează avocat definitiv dreptul muncii | Consultanță
Eveniment Schoenherr pentru companii active în domeniul alimentar - reglementări, tendințe și practică: 8 mai 2025, București
O singură casă de avocatură locală independentă concurează la titlul de ”Firma anului în România” în cadrul IFLR Europe Awards 2025, ceremonie ce va avea loc joi | NNDKP, Schoenherr și Clifford Chance Badea, printre firmele aflate pe lista scurtă a premianților din acest an
Filip & Company a asistat grupul Digi la contractarea unui împrumut de peste 54,7 mil. € în România și a unui împrumut de 275 mil. € în Spania | Alexandru Bîrsan (co-managing partener) și Rebecca Marina (counsel), în prim plan
VIDEO | Pastila de insolvență – Procedurile de restructurare (powered by ZRVP)
Rundă de promovări la ZRVP | Echipa de seniori a firmei crește cu șapte avocați. Dr. Cosmin Vasile: ”Ceea ce definește avocatul ZRVP este căutarea obsesivă a soluției juridice care să răspundă cel mai bine nevoilor clientului, iar aceasta este calitatea cheie a fiecărui membru al echipei ZRVP și primul criteriu care stă la baza promovărilor anuale”
CMS anunță noi promovări în România | Alina Tihan preia rolul de Partener în departamentul de Finanțe, iar Andrei Tercu devine co-coordonator al departamentului de Taxe. Horea Popescu, Managing Partner: ”Abilitățile lor de lideri și capacitatea de a obține rezultate excepționale le-a adus încrederea și aprecierea tuturor”
Chambers Europe 2025 | Cele mai bune firme locale de avocați în 9 arii de practică. NNDKP, Filip & Company, Schoenherr, RTPR și Țuca Zbarcea & Asociații au cele mai multe nominalizări pe prima bandă a performanței profesionale
Bondoc și Asociații a anulat un Proces-verbal de sancționare emis în materia RO e-Transport. Ce avocați au fost în echipa de proiect
Trei avocați români de la Bondoc & Asociații, Filip & Company și DLA Piper sunt considerați ‘Eminent Practitioners’ în practica de fuziuni și achiziții. Clasamentul Chambers Europe 2025, cu cei mai buni avocați de Corporate ̸ M&A din România
Cei mai buni litigatori din România, văzuți de Chambers Europe 2025 | Cine sunt practicienii apreciați de clienți în practica de Dispute Resolution și ce spun clienții despre aceștia. Nouă avocați români sunt evidențiați în practica de arbitraj
 
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
  • BizBanker

  • BizLeader

      in curand...
  • SeeNews

    in curand...